J Plant Ecol ›› Advance articles     DOI:10.1093/jpe/rtaf200

• Research Articles •    

Does the reduction of precipitation always suppress vegetation productivity?

Mengdie Wanga#, Chuan Jina,b#, Yao Gaob, Weirong Zhanga, Kai Dia, Yue Jiaoa, Liucui Wua, Zehao Fana, Cheng Yia, Nana Caia, Siyuan Zhoua, and Zhongmin Hua*   

  1. a Hainan Baoting Tropical Rainforest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, School of Ecology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

    b School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China

    #These authors contributed equally

    *Correspondence to: Zhongmin Hu (huzm@hainanu.edu.cn)

  • Received:2025-07-19 Accepted:2025-11-10 Online:2025-11-24 Published:2025-11-24
  • Supported by:
    The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U23A2002; 2501470; 62472216), the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (425QN239; 425QN243; 423RC432), the Collaborative Innovation Program of Hainan University (XTCX2022STB07), and the start-up fund of Hainan University (KYQD(ZR)21096).

降水减少是否总是抑制植被生产力?

Abstract: Understanding vegetation sensitivity to water deficit is essential for assessing ecosystem vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Based on flux and meteorological data from 77 global sites, we developed a new approach that combines percentile and standard deviation methods to characterize precipitation (PPT) and soil water content (SWC) deficit conditions. Simultaneously, we applied the SWH model to simulate evapotranspiration (ET) processes, separating transpiration (T) from evaporation (E). Spatially explicit analysis revealed significant variations in vegetation sensitivity to PPT and SWC deficits (SPPT and SSWC) across ecosystem types, generally intensifying with increasing deficit severity. Notably, nearly half of the sites exhibited contrasting responses, with positive SSWC but negative SPPT. This divergence was particularly pronounced in forest ecosystems, likely due to precipitation legacy effects. Moreover, the study revealed the unexpected increase in gross primary productivity (GPP) under SWC deficit conditions at certain sites, which was mechanistically linked to increased T, T/ET, and water use efficiency (WUE). We proposed that vegetation exhibits growth inertia, whereby plants that thrive under favorable prior conditions can sustain higher soil water utilization rates and GPP, which in turn leads to soil moisture depletion. Specifically, vegetation actively regulates water use to maintain productivity through transpiration-mediated adjustments, challenging conventional views of passive drought responses. To sum up, these results collectively highlighted that SWC surpasses PPT in determining vegetation sensitivity to water deficit, and that comprehensive vegetation drought sensitivity assessments must explicitly consider the differential impacts of E and T on SWC dynamics.

Key words: vegetation, sensitivity, soil water content, precipitation, gross primary productivity

摘要:
理解植被对水分亏缺的敏感性对于评估生态系统脆弱性和适应能力至关重要。基于全球77个站点的通量和气象数据,本研究结合标准差和百分位数以表征降水和土壤含水量的亏缺状况。同时,研究应用SWH模型模拟蒸散发过程,将蒸腾与蒸发进行区分。分析表明,不同生态系统类型的植被对降水和土壤水亏缺的敏感性存在显著差异,且通常随亏缺程度加剧而增强。值得注意的是,近半数站点表现出相反的响应模式,即植被对土壤水分亏缺的敏感性为正而对降水减少是表现的敏感性为负。这种差异在森林生态系统中尤为明显,很可能归因于降水的遗留效应。此外,研究发现在某些站点土壤水分亏缺条件下总初级生产力出现意外增加,这一现象机制上与蒸腾量、蒸腾占比及水分利用效率的提高相关。我们提出,植被表现出生长惯性:在前期有利条件下旺盛生长的植物能够维持较高的土壤水分利用率和植被总初级生产力,进而导致土壤水分过度消耗。具体而言,植被通过蒸腾介导的调节主动调控水分利用以维持生产力,这对传统的被动干旱响应观点提出了挑战。总之,这些结果共同表明,在决定植被对水分亏缺的敏感性方面,土壤水的作用超过降水,且全面的植被干旱敏感性评估必须明确考虑蒸发和蒸腾对土壤水动态的差异性影响。

关键词: 植被, 敏感性, 土壤水, 降水, 总初级生产力