Species traits and shoot-root biomass allocation in 20 dry-grassland species

doi:10.1093/jpe/rtw143

Abstract

Abstract: Aims A plant has a limited amount of resources at any time and it allocates them to different structures. In spite of the large number of previous studies on allocation patterns within single species, knowledge of general patterns in species allocation is still very limited. This is because each study was done in different conditions using different methodology, making generalization difficult. We investigate intraspecific above- versus below-ground biomass allocation among individuals across a spectrum of dry-grassland plant species at two different developmental stages and ask whether allocation is age- and species specific, and whether differences among species can be explained by their life-history traits and phylogeny.
Methods We collected data on above- and below-ground biomass of seedlings and adult plants of 20 species from a common garden experiment. We analysed data on shoot–root biomass allocation allometrically and studied the relationship between the allometric exponents (slopes on log–log scale), species life-history traits and phylogenetic distances.
Important findings We found isometric as well as allometric patterns of biomass allocation in the studied species. Seedlings and adult individuals of more than half of the species differed in their above- versus below-ground biomass allometric exponents. Seedlings and adult individuals of the remaining species differed in their allometric coefficients (intercepts). Annual species generally allocated proportionally more to above- than below-ground biomass as seedlings than as adults, whereas perennial species showed the opposite pattern. Plant life-history traits, such as plant life span, age of first flowering, month in which the species begin flowering and specific leaf area were much more important in explaining differences in shoot–root allometry among species than were phylogenetic relationships. This suggests that allocation patterns vary greatly among closely related species but can be predicted based on species life-history traits.

Key words: above-ground biomass, below-ground biomass, allometry, isometry, seedling, adult plant, life-history traits, phylogenetic relatedness, root-shoot ratio

摘要：
Aims A plant has a limited amount of resources at any time and it allocates them to different structures. In spite of the large number of previous studies on allocation patterns within single species, knowledge of general patterns in species allocation is still very limited. This is because each study was done in different conditions using different methodology, making generalization difficult. We investigate intraspecific above- versus below-ground biomass allocation among individuals across a spectrum of dry-grassland plant species at two different developmental stages and ask whether allocation is age- and species specific, and whether differences among species can be explained by their life-history traits and phylogeny.
Methods We collected data on above- and below-ground biomass of seedlings and adult plants of 20 species from a common garden experiment. We analysed data on shoot–root biomass allocation allometrically and studied the relationship between the allometric exponents (slopes on log–log scale), species life-history traits and phylogenetic distances.
Important findings We found isometric as well as allometric patterns of biomass allocation in the studied species. Seedlings and adult individuals of more than half of the species differed in their above- versus below-ground biomass allometric exponents. Seedlings and adult individuals of the remaining species differed in their allometric coefficients (intercepts). Annual species generally allocated proportionally more to above- than below-ground biomass as seedlings than as adults, whereas perennial species showed the opposite pattern. Plant life-history traits, such as plant life span, age of first flowering, month in which the species begin flowering and specific leaf area were much more important in explaining differences in shoot–root allometry among species than were phylogenetic relationships. This suggests that allocation patterns vary greatly among closely related species but can be predicted based on species life-history traits.

Iveta Husáková, Jacob Weiner, Zuzana Münzbergová. Species traits and shoot-root biomass allocation in 20 dry-grassland species[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(2): 273-285.

[1]	Dan Peng, Haichao Zhou, Steven C Pennings, Yihui Zhang. Trait–environment interactions mediate the encroachment of an exotic tree in coastal wetland transition zones [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2026, 19(2): 1-.
[2]	Yongning Li, Zhengjiao Liu, Yi Zheng, Yuxin Chen, Minxia Liang, Xubing Liu, Shixiao Yu. Unraveling the vital rates in the seedling-to-sapling transition via plant trait networks in a subtropical forest [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(6): 1-.
[3]	Yangyang Liu, Hong Qian, Yadong Zhou. Environmental variables shape the deviation of phylogenetic relatedness between terrestrial and aquatic herbaceous angiosperms across China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(3): 1-15.
[4]	Junjiong Shao, Xuhui Zhou, Lingyan Zhou, Yan Li. Plant biomass-leaf area allometry and ambient plant traits predict biomass responses to global warming [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(3): 1-15.
[5]	Pengcheng Jiang, Han He, Zikun Mao, Yanjun Su, Mengxu Zhang, Meihui Zhu, Zhichao Xu, Jin Yin, Hongyi Jiang, Shuai Fang, Xugao Wang. Canopy properties predominately explain above-ground biomass stock in temperate forests [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(2): 1-14.
[6]	Huifang Wu, Qingpei Yang, Jing Chen, Mingzhen Lu, Weizheng Ren, Yanmei Xiong, Yuxin Pei, Preetika B. Chand, Oscar J. Valverde-Barrantes, Jingjing Cao, Deliang Kong. Divergent leaf–root coordination between mangroves and non-mangroves [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(2): 1-14.
[7]	Rong Tang, Yanpei Guo, Zhiyao Tang. Intraspecific variation in leaf morphology of three widespread woody species along climatic gradients [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2024, 17(6): 1-12.
[8]	Xu-Fang Chen, Li-Shen Qian, Hong-Hua Shi, Ya-Zhou Zhang, Min-Shu Song, Hang Sun, Jian-Guo Chen. Allelopathic potentials of surrounding vegetation on seedling establishment of alpine cushion Arenaria polytrichoides Edgew. [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2024, 17(2): 0-rtae026.
[9]	Jinfeng Zhang, Jingru Ge, Xingfu Yan, Buddhi Dayananda, Yonghong Luo, Junqing Li. Frequency-dependent seedling predation by rodents: growth and survival of Quercus wutaishanica in two habitats [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(3): 0-rtac086.
[10]	Chunqiang Wei, Bingbing Jia, Lunlun Gao, Zhen Liu, Yuming Liang, Xin Zhang and Xinmin Lu. Plant growth ability, rather than phylogenetic relatedness, predicts the effect of soil biota from an abandoned field on native and exotic plants [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(1): 0-.
[11]	Yanpei Guo, Zhengbing Yan, Yi-Wei Zhang, Guoyi Zhou, Zongqiang Xie, and Zhiyao Tang. Environmental constraints on the inter-genus variation in the scaling relationship between leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(4): 616-627.
[12]	Kai Yue, Dario A. Fornara, Wang Li, Xiangyin Ni, Yan Peng, Shu Liao, Siyi Tan, Dingyi Wang, Fuzhong Wu, and Yusheng Yang. Nitrogen addition affects plant biomass allocation but not allometric relationships among different organs across the globe [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(3): 361-371.
[13]	Marúcia da Cunha Fagundes, Ândrea Carla Dalmolin, Luciana Santos Lobo, Ana Cristina Schilling, Martielly Santana dos Santos, and Marcelo Schramm Mielke. Growth and phenotypic plasticity of two tropical tree species under low light availability [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(2): 270-279.
[14]	Yang Li, Longyu Hou, Bing Song, Shiqiang Wan, Xiaoqin Sun and Linghao Li. Seasonal distribution of increased precipitation in maternal environments influences offspring performance of Potentilla tanacetifolia in a temperate steppe ecosystem [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(4): 742-750.
[15]	Dandan Hu, Jerry M. Baskin, Carol C. Baskin, Xuejun Yang, Zhenying Huang. Ecological role of physical dormancy in seeds of Oxytropis racemosa in a semiarid sandland with unpredictable rainfall [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(4): 542-552.