Ecogeographical variation of 12 morphological traits within Pinus tabulaeformis: the effects of environmental factors and demographic histories

doi:10.1093/jpe/rtw033

Abstract

Abstract: Aims More data are needed about how genetic variation (GV) and environmental factors influence phenotypic variation within the natural populations of long-lived species with broad geographic distributions. To fill this gap, we examined the correlations among environmental factors and phenotypic variation within and among 13 natural populations of Pinus tabulaeformis consisting of four demographically distinct groups within the entire distributional range.
Methods Using the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) model, we measured 12 morphological traits and constructed alternative candidate models for the relationships between each morphological trait and key climatic variables and genetic groups. We then compared the AIC weight for each candidate model to identify the best approximating model for ecogeographical variation of P. tabulaeformis. The partitioning of variance was assessed subsequently by evaluating the independent variables of the selected best models using partial redundancy analysis.
Important findings Significant phenotypic variation of the morphological traits was observed both within individual populations and among populations. Variation partition analyses showed that most of the phenotypic variation was co-determined by both GV and climatic factors. GV accounted for the largest proportion of reproductive trait variation, whereas local key climatic factors (i.e. actual evapotranspiration, AET) accounted for the largest proportion of phenotypic variation in the remaining investigated traits. Our results indicate that both genetic divergence and key environmental factors affect the phenotypic variation observed among populations of this species, and that reproductive and vegetative traits adaptively respond differently with respect to local environmental conditions. This partitioning of factors can inform those making predictions about phenotypic variation in response to future changes in climatic conditions (particularly those affecting AET).

Key words: Akaike's Information Criterion, environmental factors, genetic variation, information-theoretic approach, phenotypic variation

摘要：
Aims More data are needed about how genetic variation (GV) and environmental factors influence phenotypic variation within the natural populations of long-lived species with broad geographic distributions. To fill this gap, we examined the correlations among environmental factors and phenotypic variation within and among 13 natural populations of Pinus tabulaeformis consisting of four demographically distinct groups within the entire distributional range.
Methods Using the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) model, we measured 12 morphological traits and constructed alternative candidate models for the relationships between each morphological trait and key climatic variables and genetic groups. We then compared the AIC weight for each candidate model to identify the best approximating model for ecogeographical variation of P. tabulaeformis. The partitioning of variance was assessed subsequently by evaluating the independent variables of the selected best models using partial redundancy analysis.
Important findings Significant phenotypic variation of the morphological traits was observed both within individual populations and among populations. Variation partition analyses showed that most of the phenotypic variation was co-determined by both GV and climatic factors. GV accounted for the largest proportion of reproductive trait variation, whereas local key climatic factors (i.e. actual evapotranspiration, AET) accounted for the largest proportion of phenotypic variation in the remaining investigated traits. Our results indicate that both genetic divergence and key environmental factors affect the phenotypic variation observed among populations of this species, and that reproductive and vegetative traits adaptively respond differently with respect to local environmental conditions. This partitioning of factors can inform those making predictions about phenotypic variation in response to future changes in climatic conditions (particularly those affecting AET).

Mingfei Ji, Jianming Deng, Buqing Yao, Renfei Chen, Zhexuan Fan, Jiawei Guan, Xiaowei Li, Fan Wu, Karl J. Niklas. Ecogeographical variation of 12 morphological traits within Pinus tabulaeformis: the effects of environmental factors and demographic histories[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(2): 386-396.

[1]	Qing Wei, Chang-Fan Chen, Cheng-Gang Qiu, Ning-Fei Lei, Jin-Song Chen, Yong-Mei Liao. Combined plasticity within and between generations increases drought resistance more in a clonal, introduced, invasive plant than its native congener [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2026, 19(3): 1-.
[2]	Zhikun Ren, Yuqi Ai, Müller-Schärer Heinz, Junqi Liu, Xinrou Yuan, Xinyi Tang, Jintao Liu, Wei Huang, Yan Sun. Climatic, human-induced and biodiversity factors differently shape the suitable areas of Bidens pilosa [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(2): 1-16.
[3]	Yuhan Liu, Yifei Zhao, Qiaosheng Li, Zijun Tan, Zugeng Zhang, Yuxuan Liu, Jianming Wang, Congcong Liu, Chunwang Xiao. Variation in leaf construction cost and environmental drivers in China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(2): 1-14.
[4]	Min Zhang, Jun Wen, Xiaoli Wang, Cancan Zhao, Yuan Ma, Yushou Ma, Shixiong Li. Rest-grazing in spring affects the soil microbial community mainly by altering plant diversity [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(1): 1-15.
[5]	Weitao Wang, Yun Jiang, Yongfa Chen, Wenqi Luo, Dong He, Youshi Wang, Chengjin Chu, Buhang Li. Using intraspecific variation of functional traits and environmental factors to understand the formation of nestedness patterns of a local forest community [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(6): 1185-1198.
[6]	Hu Yao, Haijun Peng, Bing Hong, Hanwei Ding, Yetang Hong, Yongxuan Zhu, Jie Wang and Cheng Cai. Seasonal and diurnal variation in ecosystem respiration and environmental controls from an alpine wetland in arid northwest China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(5): 933-946.
[7]	Rubén Portela, Bi-Cheng Dong, Fei-Hai Yu, Rodolfo Barreiro, Sergio R. Roiloa, and Dalva M. Silva Matos. Trans-generational effects in the clonal invader Alternanthera philoxeroides [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(1): 122-129.
[8]	Tingting An, Mingjie Xu, Tao Zhang, Chengqun Yu, Yingge Li, Ning Chen, Jiaxing Zu, Junxiang Li, Juntao Zhu, Yi Sun, Tingting Zhao and Guirui Yu. Grazing alters environmental control mechanisms of evapotranspiration in an alpine meadow of the Tibetan Plateau [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(5): 834-845.
[9]	Zhiheng Wang, Yaoqi Li, Xiangyan Su, Shengli Tao, Xiao Feng, Qinggang Wang, Xiaoting Xu, Yunpeng Liu, Sean T. Michaletz, Nawal Shrestha, Markku Larjavaara, and Brian J. Enquist. Patterns and ecological determinants of woody plant height in eastern Eurasia and its relation to primary productivity [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(5): 791-803.
[10]	Jian Sun, Shuli Niu, Jinniu Wang. Divergent biomass partitioning to aboveground and belowground across forests in China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(3): 484-492.
[11]	Wilfredo L. Gonzáles, Lorena H. Suárez, Ernesto Gianoli. Genetic variation in the reduction of attractive floral traits of an annual tarweed in response to drought and apical damage [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2016, 9(5): 629-635.
[12]	Ken Keefover-Ring, Kennedy F. Rubert-Nason, Alison E. Bennett, Richard L. Lindroth. Growth and chemical responses of trembling aspen to simulated browsing and ungulate saliva [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2016, 9(4): 474-484.
[13]	Juan Chen, Chao Wang, Fei-Hua Wu, Wen-Hua Wang, Ting-Wu Liu, Juan Chen, Qiang Xiao, Bin-Yuan He, Hai-Lei Zheng. Variation of nitric oxide emission potential in plants: a possible link to leaf N content and net photosynthetic activity [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2015, 8(3): 313-320.
[14]	Markus Fischer, Eckart Winkler, Bernhard Schmid. Simulating the evolution of a clonal trait in plants with sexual and vegetative reproduction [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2008, 1(3): 161-171.