J Plant Ecol ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): rtaf077.DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtaf077

• Research Articles •    

Artificial light reduced the temperature responsiveness of Ginkgo budburst

Yufeng Gong1,†, Zhaofei Wu1,†, Mingwei Li1, Shuxin Wang1, Yangjing Nie1, Nan Wang1, Yongshuo H. Fu1,2*   

  1. 1 College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    2 Plants and Ecosystems, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Antwerpen 2000, Belgium
    Corresponding
    Yongshuo H. Fu
    Phone: +86-10-58802736
    Email: yfu@bnu.edu.cn
    These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Received:2025-02-07 Accepted:2025-05-13 Online:2025-05-27 Published:2025-08-01
  • Supported by:
    The study was supported by the International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China-FAPESP Program (Grant no. 42261144755), the National Key Research and Development Program (2023YFF0805604), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. 2243300004), ZW was funded by the China Scholarship Council (no. 202206040112).

人工夜间光照降低了银杏春季萌芽对温度的响应

Abstract: Urbanization-induced warming advanced the timing of spring budburst, impacting on urban ecosystems. However, how urban artificial light affects the spring budburst and its spatial variation within species distribution are less studied, especially lacking experimental evidences. Here, we conducted a climate-controlled experiment using twigs collected from artificial light (AL) and no-artificial light (NoAL) conditions at three latitudinal gradients (Lhigh, Lmiddle and Llow) in China. We found that the temperature responsiveness of spring budburst (Tres, defined as the number of days to budburst after the twigs are placed into the chambers, with a smaller value indicating stronger responsiveness) was significantly stronger for NoAL individuals (54.3 days) than AL individuals (60.7 days). Additionally, AL twigs exhibited a greater photoperiod limitation (12.7 days vs. 7.6 days) and a higher heat requirement (732.15 K vs. 679.15 K) than NoAL twigs, suggesting that individuals exposed to artificial light may have adapted to longer photoperiod and increased the heat requirement for budburst. More importantly, Tres difference between AL and NoAL individuals was more pronounced in northern sites (5.8 days at Lhigh, 12.2 days at Lmiddle) than in southern sites (0.7 days at Llow), possibly due to higher inter-annual temperature variability at higher latitudes. Our findings provide experimental evidence of the effect of artificial light on tree budburst and highlight the need to consider the adaptability of urban trees when studying phenological responses to climate change in urban environments.

Key words: urbanization, artificial light, spring phenology, photoperiod, spatial variation

摘要:
城市化导致的变暖提前了春季萌芽时间,对城市生态系统产生了重要影响。然而,关于城市夜间人工光照如何影响春季萌芽及其在物种分布范围内的空间变异,目前研究较少且缺乏实验证据。本研究通过气候控制实验,采集中国3个纬度梯度(北京、郑州和浙江)有路灯和无路灯条件下的树木枝条进行观测。结果表明,无路灯个体的春季萌芽温度响应(Tres,定义为枝条放入气候室后至萌芽所需天数,数值越小表明响应越强)显著强于有路灯个体(54.3 d vs. 60.7 d)。有路灯枝条表现出更强的光周期限制(12.7 d vs. 7.6 d)和更高的萌芽热量需求(732.15 K vs. 679.15 K),表明长期暴露于人工光照的个体可能通过适应更长的光周期并提高萌芽的热量需求来响应光照环境变化。更重要的是,有路灯与无路灯个体的Tres差异在北方地区(高纬度5.8 d,中纬度12.2 d)比南方地区(低纬度0.7 d)更为显著,这可能与高纬度地区年际温度波动较大有关。本研究通过实验揭示了人工光照对树木萌芽的影响机制,强调在研究气候变化背景下城市环境对植物物候的影响时,需要特别关注城市树木的生态适应性。