Journal of Plant Ecology ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 1-28.DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtaf086
• •
Yuguang Ke1, Hongqiang Wang2, Yushu Zhang3, Jiale Chen1, Yalong Shi2, Yadong Yang2, Qiang Yu1, Xiwen Li4, Ang Li5, Jianguo Wu6 and Honghui Wu2,*
1School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China, 2State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China, 3Beijing Key Laboratory of Ecological Function Assessment and Regulation Technology of Green Space, Beijing Academy of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Beijing 100102, China, 4State Key Laboratory for Quality Ensurance and Sustainable Use of Dao-Di Herbs, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China, 5State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China, 6School of Life Sciences and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University,Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
*Corresponding author. E-mail: wuhonghui@caas.cn
摘要: 大气氮沉降包括无机氮和有机氮两种形式。由于物种丰富度通常与生态系统稳定性呈正相关,那么相较于有机氮,无机氮输入往往导致的更严重的物种丰富度下降可能进一步降低生态系统稳定性。然而,以往评估氮沉降对生态系统稳定性影响的研究主要基于单独施加无机氮或有机氮,导致其结论可能存在偏差。本研究依托2014年建立在一个温带草甸草原的长期氮添加(10 g N m–2 year–1) 实验平台,使用从2017到2022年连续6年的植物群落数据,评估了不同无机氮与有机氮比例(0:10、3:7、5:5、7:3和10:0)对植物群落生产力时间稳定性(即生态系统稳定性) 的影响及机制。研究结果表明,尽管氮添加显著降低了生态系统稳定性(平均降幅26.7%),但无机氮与有机氮比例对生态系统稳定性无显著差异。无机氮输入相比有机氮输入导致了更显著的物种丰富度下降:无机氮与有机氮比例为10:0时,物种丰富度降低了54.1%,而在0:10时降低了31.8%。虽然无机氮与有机氮比例对物种非同步性、种群稳定性和优势种稳定性均无显著差异,但生态系统稳定性与物种非同步性和优势种稳定性呈正相关。这些研究结果表明,物种非同步性与优势种稳定性维持着不同无机氮与有机氮比例情景下的生态系统稳定性。综上所述,虽然无机氮导致物种丧失更严重,但通过无机氮或有机氮单独添加来评估氮沉降对生态系统稳定性的影响仍然可行。