J Plant Ecol ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4): 722-729.doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtz012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The shift in the abundance of two Stipa species in response to land use change is associated with their divergent reproductive strategies

Xiaoshuai Wang1, Frank Yonghong Li1,*, , Yuanheng Li2, Xin Song1, Xudong Guo1, Xiangyang Hou2 and Taogetao Baoyin1   

  1. 1 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
    2 Grassland Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010020, China
    *Correspondence address. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China. Tel: +86-471-4993130; Fax: +86-471-4992147; E-mail:lifyhong@126.com
  • Received:2018-10-31 Revised:2019-01-07 Accepted:2019-02-27 Online:2019-06-12 Published:2019-08-01



The divergent changes of plant species under land use changes are key mechanisms underlying vegetation succession. Stipa grandis steppe and Stipa krylovii steppe are two plant communities widely distributed on the Mongolian Plateau. They have been speculated to be able to succeed into each other under different land use types and intensities based on the observations on their presence and abundance at the sites with different land use history. However, no direct evidence, neither the underlying mechanisms, have been reported for this speculation. Here, we verified this speculation and explored the underlying mechanisms in the typical steppe region of Inner Mongolia.


We investigated the abundance and reproductive behavior of S. krylovii and S. grandis under different land use types and intensities. We used 18 grassland paddocks to run a 6-year experiment with 6 management treatments (T0—unused, T1—grazing monthly in plant growing season, T2, T4, T6—grazing in different months in plant growing season, and T8—mowing) replicated three times. We measured the relative density and cover of S. krylovii and S. grandis using line sampling method and examined their number and biomass of vegetative and reproductive tillers using quadrat method in each paddock after treatments for 4 and 6 years. We also determined these plant attributes in 14 pairs of heavily versus lightly used grassland plots in a wide area (150 km × 200 km) of the typical steppe region.

Important Findings

1. Grazing largely and mowing moderately decreased the density ratio and coverage ratio of S. grandis to S. krylovii in grasslands (P < 0.05), and the differences in these ratios between grazed and unused grasslands increased with time.

2. Grazing, but not mowing, significantly enhanced the relative density (Nrep = reproductive tiller number/total tiller number) of, and biomass allocation (Brep = reproductive tiller biomass/total biomass) to, reproductive tillers of S. krylovii (P < 0.05), but not S. grandis. This grazing enhancement to sexual reproduction of S. krylovii, and additionally inhibition to Nrep of S. grandis (P < 0.05), were found across the 14 pairs of heavily versus lightly used plots.

3. Seasonal pattern of grazing affected sexual reproduction of S. krylovii. The Nrep and Brep was higher under grazing in July and September (T4) than in July and August (T6) or in May and July (T2) (P < 0.05), suggesting a relatively positive effect of grazing on sexual reproduction in July (tasseling phenophase) than in May or August.

Our results provide direct evidence to the reciprocal change of S. grandis and S. krylovii in steppe communities under different management and indicate that gazing or mowing enhancement of sexual reproduction of S. krylovii relative to S. grandis is one of the mechanisms for the change.

No related articles found!
Full text



[1] You Wen-hui, Song Yong-chang. A Study on Energy in Vascular Aquatic Macrophyte Communities in Dianshan Lake[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1995, 19(3): 208 -216 .
[2] Cristina Salmeri, Cristian Brullo, Salvatore Brullo, Giampietro Giusso Del Galdo, Ivan I. Moysiyenko. What is Allium paniculatum? Establishing taxonomic and molecular phylogenetic relationships within A. sect. Codonoprasum[J]. J Syst Evol, 2016, 54(2): 123 -135 .
[3] Taylor E. Shaw. Species diversity in restoration plantings: Important factors for increasing the diversity of threatened tree species in the restoration of the Araucaria forest ecosystem[J]. Plant Diversity, 2019, 41(02): 84 -93 .
[4] ZHAN Zha_Jun, SUN Han_Dong, WU Hou_Ming and YUE Jian_Min. Chemical Components from the Fungus Englero myces goetzei[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2003, 45(2): 248 -252 .
[5] Ke-Fu Zhao, Jie Song, Hai Fan, San Zhou, and Meng Zhao. Growth Response to Ionic and Osmotic Stress of NaCl in Salt-tolerant and Salt-sensitive Maize[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2010, 52(5): 468 -475 .
[6] ZHANG Li-Quan, WU Jian-Ping, ZHEN Yu, SHU Jiong. A GIS-Based Gradient Analysis of the Urban Landscape Pattern of Shanghai Metropolitan Region[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2004, 28(1): 78 -85 .
[7] ZHU Hua,WANG Hong,LI Baogui. A New Variety of the Genus Lindera from Yunnan[J]. Plant Diversity, 1998, 20(01): 1 -3 .
[8] Tang Tsin, Wang Fa-Tsuan. Contributions to the Knowledge of Eastern Asiatic Orchidaceae II.[J]. J Syst Evol, 1951, 1(1): 23 -102 .
[9] Zhonghua Wang;*;Tingjie Yu. Research Advances in the Key Enzymes Involved in Rice Starch Quality Regulation[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2008, 25(06): 741 -752 .
[10] Quanying Du, Zhi Li, Shurun Liu, Hongyan Liu. Dynamics of species diversity and characteristics of halophytic plant communities around saline lakes in arid and semi-arid regions of Inner Mongolia[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2007, 15(3): 271 -281 .