J Plant Ecol ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4): 722-729.doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtz012

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The shift in the abundance of two Stipa species in response to land use change is associated with their divergent reproductive strategies

Xiaoshuai Wang1, Frank Yonghong Li1,*, , Yuanheng Li2, Xin Song1, Xudong Guo1, Xiangyang Hou2 and Taogetao Baoyin1   

  1. 1 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
    2 Grassland Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010020, China
    *Correspondence address. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China. Tel: +86-471-4993130; Fax: +86-471-4992147; E-mail:lifyhong@126.com
  • Received:2018-10-31 Revised:2019-01-07 Accepted:2019-02-27 Online:2019-06-12 Published:2019-08-01

Abstract:

Aims

The divergent changes of plant species under land use changes are key mechanisms underlying vegetation succession. Stipa grandis steppe and Stipa krylovii steppe are two plant communities widely distributed on the Mongolian Plateau. They have been speculated to be able to succeed into each other under different land use types and intensities based on the observations on their presence and abundance at the sites with different land use history. However, no direct evidence, neither the underlying mechanisms, have been reported for this speculation. Here, we verified this speculation and explored the underlying mechanisms in the typical steppe region of Inner Mongolia.

Methods

We investigated the abundance and reproductive behavior of S. krylovii and S. grandis under different land use types and intensities. We used 18 grassland paddocks to run a 6-year experiment with 6 management treatments (T0—unused, T1—grazing monthly in plant growing season, T2, T4, T6—grazing in different months in plant growing season, and T8—mowing) replicated three times. We measured the relative density and cover of S. krylovii and S. grandis using line sampling method and examined their number and biomass of vegetative and reproductive tillers using quadrat method in each paddock after treatments for 4 and 6 years. We also determined these plant attributes in 14 pairs of heavily versus lightly used grassland plots in a wide area (150 km × 200 km) of the typical steppe region.

Important Findings

1. Grazing largely and mowing moderately decreased the density ratio and coverage ratio of S. grandis to S. krylovii in grasslands (P < 0.05), and the differences in these ratios between grazed and unused grasslands increased with time.

2. Grazing, but not mowing, significantly enhanced the relative density (Nrep = reproductive tiller number/total tiller number) of, and biomass allocation (Brep = reproductive tiller biomass/total biomass) to, reproductive tillers of S. krylovii (P < 0.05), but not S. grandis. This grazing enhancement to sexual reproduction of S. krylovii, and additionally inhibition to Nrep of S. grandis (P < 0.05), were found across the 14 pairs of heavily versus lightly used plots.

3. Seasonal pattern of grazing affected sexual reproduction of S. krylovii. The Nrep and Brep was higher under grazing in July and September (T4) than in July and August (T6) or in May and July (T2) (P < 0.05), suggesting a relatively positive effect of grazing on sexual reproduction in July (tasseling phenophase) than in May or August.

Our results provide direct evidence to the reciprocal change of S. grandis and S. krylovii in steppe communities under different management and indicate that gazing or mowing enhancement of sexual reproduction of S. krylovii relative to S. grandis is one of the mechanisms for the change.

Key words: reproductive tiller, vegetative tiller, succession, grazing, mowing

[1] Wenting Liu, Shixian Sun, Chunping Zhang, Shijie Lv and Quanmin Dong. Linking plant spatial aggregation with reproductive traits and near-source seed dispersal: ecological adaptation to heavy grazing [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(4): 489-498.
[2] Juntao Zhu , Yangjian Zhang, Wenfeng Wang, Xian Yang , Ning Chen , Ruonan Shen , Li Wang and Lin Jiang. Species turnover drives grassland community to phylogenetic clustering over long-term grazing disturbance [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(2): 157-164.
[3] Xixi Yao, Jianping Wu and Xuyin Gong. Precipitation and seasonality affect grazing impacts on herbage nutritive values in alpine meadows on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(6): 993-1008.
[4] Betina Kellermann and André Eduardo Biscaia Lacerda. Arrested development? Investigating the role of bamboo in Araucaria Forest succession in Southern Brazil [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(6): 1034-1046.
[5] Tingting An, Mingjie Xu, Tao Zhang, Chengqun Yu, Yingge Li, Ning Chen, Jiaxing Zu, Junxiang Li, Juntao Zhu, Yi Sun, Tingting Zhao and Guirui Yu. Grazing alters environmental control mechanisms of evapotranspiration in an alpine meadow of the Tibetan Plateau [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(5): 834-845.
[6] Shuai Fang, Marc William Cadotte, Zuoqiang Yuan, Fei Lin, Ji Ye, Zhanqing Hao and Xugao Wang. Intraspecific trait variation improves the detection of deterministic community assembly processes in early successional forests, but not in late successional forests [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(4): 593-602.
[7] Werner Ulrich, Markus Klemens Zaplata, Susanne Winter and Anton Fischer. Directional changes of species spatial dispersion and realized environmental niches drive plant community assembly during early plant succession [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(3): 409-418.
[8] Fernanda C. G. Cardoso, Victor P. Zwiener and Marcia C. M. Marques. Tree phenology along a successional gradient of tropical Atlantic Forest [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(2): 272-280.
[9] R. Sagar, G.Y. Li, J.S. Singh and Shiqiang Wan. Carbon fluxes and species diversity in grazed and fenced typical steppe grassland of Inner Mongolia, China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(1): 10-22.
[10] Lingfeng Mao, Christopher W. Bater, John J. Stadt, Barry White, Piotr Tompalski, Nicholas C. Coops and Scott E. Nielsen. Environmental landscape determinants of maximum forest canopy height of boreal forests [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(1): 96-102.
[11] Xingyun Liang, Shirong Liu, Hui Wang, Jingxin Wang. Variation of carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry along a chronosequence of natural temperate forest in northeastern China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(3): 339-350.
[12] Maria Paniw, Roberto Salguero-Gómez, Fernando Ojeda. Transient facilitation of resprouting shrubs in fire-prone habitats [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(3): 475-483.
[13] Paloma Nuche, Concepción L. Alados. Shrub interactions drive vegetation succession of subalpine grasslands under two climatic conditions [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(2): 297-307.
[14] Honglin Li, Kailiang Yu, Danghui Xu, Wei Li, Dorjeeh Tondrob, Guozhen Du. Structural, compositional and trait differences between the mature and the swamp meadow communities [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(1): 158-167.
[15] Polyanne A. Coelho, Paola Ferreira Santos, Eduardo de Paiva Paula, Deborah M. G. Apgaua, Bruno Gini Madeira, Gisele Cristina de Oliveira Menino, Yule Roberta Ferreira Nunes, Rubens M. Santos, David Y. P. Tng. Tree succession across a seasonally dry tropical forest and forest-savanna ecotone in northern Minas Gerais, Brazil [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(5): 859-868.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!