Point process models, the dimensions of biodiversity and the importance of small-scale biotic interactions

doi:10.1093/jpe/rtt075

Abstract

Abstract: Aims Recent mechanistic explanations for community assembly focus on the debates surrounding niche-based deterministic and dispersal-based stochastic models. This body of work has emphasized the importance of both habitat filtering and dispersal limitation, and many of these works have utilized the assumption of species spatial independence to simplify the complexity of the spatial modeling in natural communities when given dispersal limitation and/or habitat filtering. One potential drawback of this simplification is that it does not consider species interactions and how they may influence the spatial distribution of species, phylogenetic and functional diversity. Here, we assess the validity of the assumption of species spatial independence using data from a subtropical forest plot in southeastern China.
Methods We use the four most commonly employed spatial statistical models—the homogeneous Poisson process representing pure random effect, the heterogeneous Poisson process for the effect of habitat heterogeneity, the homogenous Thomas process for sole dispersal limitation and the heterogeneous Thomas process for joint effect of habitat heterogeneity and dispersal limitation—to investigate the contribution of different mechanisms in shaping the species, phylogenetic and functional structures of communities.
Important findings Our evidence from species, phylogenetic and functional diversity demonstrates that the habitat filtering and/or dispersal-based models perform well and the assumption of species spatial independence is relatively valid at larger scales (50×50 m). Conversely, at local scales (10×10 and 20×20 m), the models often fail to predict the species, phylogenetic and functional diversity, suggesting that the assumption of species spatial independence is invalid and that biotic interactions are increasingly important at these spatial scales.

Key words: point process model, niche, neutral theory, dispersal limitation, habitat filtering, assumption of species spatial independence, community phylogenetic structure, community functional structure

摘要：
Aims Recent mechanistic explanations for community assembly focus on the debates surrounding niche-based deterministic and dispersal-based stochastic models. This body of work has emphasized the importance of both habitat filtering and dispersal limitation, and many of these works have utilized the assumption of species spatial independence to simplify the complexity of the spatial modeling in natural communities when given dispersal limitation and/or habitat filtering. One potential drawback of this simplification is that it does not consider species interactions and how they may influence the spatial distribution of species, phylogenetic and functional diversity. Here, we assess the validity of the assumption of species spatial independence using data from a subtropical forest plot in southeastern China.
Methods We use the four most commonly employed spatial statistical models—the homogeneous Poisson process representing pure random effect, the heterogeneous Poisson process for the effect of habitat heterogeneity, the homogenous Thomas process for sole dispersal limitation and the heterogeneous Thomas process for joint effect of habitat heterogeneity and dispersal limitation—to investigate the contribution of different mechanisms in shaping the species, phylogenetic and functional structures of communities.
Important findings Our evidence from species, phylogenetic and functional diversity demonstrates that the habitat filtering and/or dispersal-based models perform well and the assumption of species spatial independence is relatively valid at larger scales (50×50 m). Conversely, at local scales (10×10 and 20×20 m), the models often fail to predict the species, phylogenetic and functional diversity, suggesting that the assumption of species spatial independence is invalid and that biotic interactions are increasingly important at these spatial scales.

Xiangcheng Mi, Lei Bao, Jianhua Chen, Keping Ma. Point process models, the dimensions of biodiversity and the importance of small-scale biotic interactions[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2014, 7(2): 126-133.

[1]	Jiaoneng Yu, Fei Ren, Li Ma, Huakun Zhou, Xiaotao Huang, Yongsheng Yang, Songbo Qu, Yuxuan Cui, Ribu Shama, Yuxia Zhang, Xu-Ri, Almaz Borjigidai. Community dynamics of alpine meadows under fencing durations: based on diversity, niches, and interspecific associations [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2026, 19(1): 1-.
[2]	Congwen Wang, Yuan Wang, Linna Ma, Xuehua Ye, Guofang Liu. Distinct geographic patterns and drivers of plant, bacterial, and fungal β-diversity in semi-arid grasslands: Insights from a 1,700 km transect in northern China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2026, 19(1): 1-.
[3]	Fanjiao Kong, Dingli Wang, Yu Shi, Liya Ma, Jianqing Ding. Variation in niche effects on microbiota in two invasive plants [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(4): 1-16.
[4]	Deqiang Chen, Juanjuan Yang, Chunping Wu, Linyi Li, Siren Lan, Dianxiang Zhang, Zhong-Jian Liu, Xin Qian. Drivers of root-associated fungal community structure in a common drought-tolerant shrub at a regional scale [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(2): 1-16.
[5]	Zhikun Ren, Yuqi Ai, Müller-Schärer Heinz, Junqi Liu, Xinrou Yuan, Xinyi Tang, Jintao Liu, Wei Huang, Yan Sun. Climatic, human-induced and biodiversity factors differently shape the suitable areas of Bidens pilosa [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2025, 18(2): 1-16.
[6]	Zhenlu Qiu, Mei Zhang, Kefan Wang, Fuchen Shi. Vegetation community dynamics during naturalized developmental restoration of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in North warm temperate zone [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(4): 0-rtac102.
[7]	Ling-Feng Mao, Yu-Ran Dong, Bing-Bing Xing, You-Hua Chen, Jacqueline Dennett, Christopher Bater, John J. Stadt, Scott E. Nielsen. Maximum canopy height is associated with community phylogenetic structure in boreal forests [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(4): 0-rtac104.
[8]	Mathias Christina, Céline Gire, Mark R. Bakker, Alan Leckie, Jianming Xue, Peter W. Clinton, Zaira Negrin-Perez, José Ramon Arevalo Sierra, Jean-Christophe Domec, Maya Gonzalez. Native and invasive seedling drought-resistance under elevated temperature in common gorse populations [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(3): 0-rtac097.
[9]	Victor Pereira Zwiener, Valéria Andressa Alves. Community-level predictions in a megadiverse hotspot:comparison of stacked species distribution models to forest inventory data [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(3): 0-rtac099.
[10]	Benfeng Yin, Yuanming Zhang, Hongxiang Zhang, Anru Lou. Phylogeographic structure of Syntrichia caninervis Mitt, a xerophytic moss, highlights the expanded during glacial period [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(2): 1-rtac057.
[11]	Cameron Wagg, Andrew McKenzie-Gopsill. Mycorrhizal fungi reduce fitness differences, but coexistence is determined by differences in intrinsic plant mycorrhizal responsiveness [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(2): 0-rtac081.
[12]	Hua-Feng Wang, Xiaoting Xu, Xia-Lan Cheng, Yunpeng Liu, Ao Luo, Tong Lyu, Wen-Long Wang, Mir Muhammad Nizamani, Zhiheng Wang. Spatial patterns and determinants of Moraceae richness in China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(6): 1142-1153.
[13]	Wengang Zhang, Xiaoyan Chen, Ruiling Liu, Xingjiang Song, Gang Liu, Jiabin Zou, Zengqiang Qian, Zhihong Zhu and Langjun Cui. Realized niche shift associated with Galinsoga quadriradiata (Asteraceae) invasion in China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(3): 538-548.
[14]	Lian Liu, Xiaoting Xu, Lei Zhang, Yaoqi Li, Nawal Shrestha, Danilo M. Neves, Qinggang Wang, Hong Chang, Xiangyan Su, Yunpeng Liu, Jianyong Wu, Dimitar Dimitrov, Zhiheng Wang and Jianquan Liu. Global patterns of species richness of the holarctic alpine herb Saxifraga: the role of temperature and habitat heterogeneity [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(2): 237-252.
[15]	Yanpei Guo, Zhengbing Yan, Yi-Wei Zhang, Guoyi Zhou, Zongqiang Xie, and Zhiyao Tang. Environmental constraints on the inter-genus variation in the scaling relationship between leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(4): 616-627.