J Plant Ecol ›› Advance articles     DOI:10.1093/jpe/rtag235

    Next Articles

Vegetation structure and diaspore traits shape secondary wind dispersal: wind-tunnel insights

Liang Tiana, Wei Liangb, Zhimin Liub*, Minghu Liuc, Carol C. Baskind, e, Lu Zongf, Zhiming Xinc, g, Quanlai Zhoub, Jing Wuh, Xuanping Qini   

  1. a Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology University, Jilin 132109, China;
    b Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
    c Experimental Center of Desert Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Dengkou 015200, China;
    d Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA;
    e Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA;
    f Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    g Inner Mongolia Dengkou Desert Ecosystem National Observation Research Station, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Dengkou 015200, China;
    h School of Life Sciences, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, China;
    i Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang 277000, China
    *Correspondence: Zhimin Liu
    Address: No. 72 Wenhua Road, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
    E-mail: zmliu@iae.ac.cn
    Tel: +86-24-83970431
    Fax: +86-24-83970339
  • Received:2025-11-06 Revised:2026-08-15 Accepted:2026-09-06 Published:2026-09-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Inner Mongolia Academy of Forestry Sciences Open Research Project, Hohhot, China (KF2024ZD08), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171870) and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2022QC259).

Abstract: Vegetation structure’s role in secondary wind dispersal remains poorly understood. We used wind-tunnel experiments with standardized, artificially constructed vegetation treatments to quantify the proportion of diaspores dispersed beyond 5 m over bare ground and through 12 vegetation treatments that varied in cover (0–30%), life-form composition, vertical arrangement and horizontal pattern. Dispersal capacity declined consistently with increasing vegetation cover. At 10% cover, diaspores dispersed farther through shrub than herbaceous vegetation, whereas under some higher-cover and higher-wind conditions the pattern reversed. One-layer vegetation generally allowed greater dispersal than two-layer vegetation, especially under lower cover or higher wind speed. The effect of horizontal arrangement was weaker: aggregated vegetation increased dispersal relative to uniform vegetation only under low cover and high wind, and this difference disappeared at higher cover. Size-related diaspore traits were positively associated with secondary wind dispersal, whereas the trait axis dominated by mass and wing loading showed a negative association whose strength varied with vegetation cover. Thus, secondary wind dispersal is jointly shaped by vegetation structure and diaspore traits. These findings suggest that patch-scale vegetation structure may modify the physical filtering environment experienced by wind-dispersed diaspores. Future wind-dispersal models should incorporate vegetation interception and allow key trait effects to vary with vegetation structure.

Using a controlled wind-tunnel experiment with diaspores from 30 plant species, we tested how vegetation cover, life-form composition, vertical and horizontal arrangement, and diaspore traits influence secondary wind dispersal. Increasing vegetation cover consistently reduced dispersal, while trait effects depended on vegetation structure, highlighting vegetation as a key physical filter of diaspore movement.

Key words: diaspore traits, dispersal, life-form, vegetation cover, vegetation structure, wind tunnel, wing loading