J Plant Ecol ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6): 941-948.doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtz031

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prickly pairs: the proportion of spinescent species does not differ between islands and mainlands

Floret L. Meredith1,*, Marianne L. Tindall1, Frank A. Hemmings2 and Angela T. Moles1   

  1. 1Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
    2John T. Waterhouse Herbarium, School of Biology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
    *Correspondence address. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Tel: +61 2 9385 8302; Fax: +61 2 9385 3327; E-mail: a.moles@unsw.edu.au
  • Received:2019-01-11 Revised:2019-05-02 Accepted:2019-05-26 Online:2019-10-30 Published:2019-12-01

Abstract:

Aims

Organisms on islands are thought to escape biotic pressure and lose defensive capabilities. However, broadscale, evidence-based tests of this idea are rare. In this study, we asked: (i) whether the proportion of spinescent plant species differed between islands and mainlands and (ii) whether the proportion of spinescent species increased with increasing island area and with decreasing island distance to mainland.

Methods

We compiled species lists for 18 island–mainland pairs around Australia. We classified 1129 plant species as spinescent or non-spinescent using published species descriptions.

Important Findings

There was no significant difference between the proportion of spinescent species found on islands and on mainlands. Proportions of spinescent species were not significantly related to island area or distance to mainland. Our results suggest that spinescence is just as important to island plants as it is to mainland plants, even for plants inhabiting small or distal islands. This is unexpected, given prevailing thought and previous work on island–mainland comparisons. Our study demonstrates the importance of testing well-accepted yet untested ideas.

Key words: herbivory, island biogeography theory, physical defence, plant community, plant defence, prickles, thorns

[1] Bi-Cheng Dong, Li-Min Zhang, Kai-Yu Li, Xiao-Ting Hu, Pu Wang, Yong-Jian Wang, Fang-Li Luo, Hong-Li Li and Fei-Hai Yu. Effects of clonal integration and nitrogen supply on responses of a clonal plant to short-term herbivory [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(4): 624-635.
[2] Rubén Portela, Bi-Cheng Dong, Fei-Hai Yu, Rodolfo Barreiro and Sergio R. Roiloa. Effects of physiological integration on defense strategies against herbivory by the clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(4): 662-672.
[3] Fei Chen, Xiang Liu and Shurong Zhou. Indirect effect of nitrogen enrichment modified invertebrate herbivory through altering plant community composition in an alpine meadow [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(4): 693-702.
[4] F. Leland Russell and Gregory R. Houseman. Context dependency of insect and mammalian herbivore effects on tall thistle (Cirsium altissimum) populations [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(3): 531-541.
[5] Yoshinori Tokuoka, Kentaro Ohigashi, Koji Watanabe, Hiroshi Yamaguchi, Takahiro Ara and Nobukazu Nakagoshi. Interactions among dwarf bamboo, litter and consumption by small vertebrates place multiple constraints on the establishment of native tree seedlings in a Japanese agricultural landscape [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(2): 292-305.
[6] Adara Pardo, Yonatan Cáceres, Fernando Pulido. Intraspecific variation in heritable secondary metabolites and defensive strategies in a relict tree [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(2): 256-265.
[7] Eva Castells, Maria Morante, Sandra Saura-Mas, Anabel Blasco-Moreno. Plant-herbivore assemblages under natural conditions are driven by plant size, not chemical defenses [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(6): 1012-1021.
[8] Brad J. Farmilo, John W. Morgan, Dale G. Nimmo. Plant growth in a fragmented forest is a consequence of top-down and bottom-up processes, but not their interaction [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(4): 601-609.
[9] Marianne L. Tindall, Fiona J. Thomson, Shawn W. Laffan, Angela T. Moles. Is there a latitudinal gradient in the proportion of species with spinescence? [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(2): 294-300.
[10] Christoph Z. Hahn, Pascal A. Niklaus, Helge Bruelheide, Stefan G. Michalski, Miaomiao Shi, Xuefei Yang, Xueqin Zeng, Markus Fischer, Walter Durka. Opposing intra vs. interspecific diversity effects on herbivory and growth in subtropical experimental tree assemblages [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(1): 242-251.
[11] Xueqin Zeng, Walter Durka, Markus Fischer. Species-specific effects of genetic diversity and species diversity of experimental communities on early tree performance [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(1): 252-258.
[12] Wilfredo L. Gonzáles, Lorena H. Suárez, Ernesto Gianoli. Genetic variation in the reduction of attractive floral traits of an annual tarweed in response to drought and apical damage [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2016, 9(5): 629-635.
[13] Justin S. H. Wan, Stephen P. Bonser. Enemy release at range edges: do invasive species escape their herbivores as they expand into new areas? [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2016, 9(5): 636-647.
[14] Blake M. Engelhardt, Jeanne C. Chambers, Peter J. Weisberg. Geomorphic predictors of riparian vegetation in small mountain watersheds [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2015, 8(6): 593-604.
[15] Ally Ruttan, Christopher J. Lortie. A systematic review of the attractant-decoy and repellent-plant hypotheses: do plants with heterospecific neighbours escape herbivory? [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2015, 8(4): 337-346.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Yu Feng-lan;Wang Jing-ping;Li Jing-min and Shan Xue-qin. The Isolation and Identification of Sterols and Other Constituents from Seed Fat of Sapium sebiferum[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1989, 6(02): 121 -123 .
[2] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2000, 17(专辑): 8 -08 .
[3] LI Al-Fen;CHEN Min amd ZHOU Bai-Cheng. Advances and Problems in Studies of Photosynthetic Pigment-Protein Complexes of Brown Algae[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(04): 365 -371 .
[4] CHEN Xiao-Mei and GUO Shun-Xing. Research Advances in Plant Disease Resistive Material[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(06): 658 -664 .
[5] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2005, 22(增刊): 157 .
[6] LI Yan WANG Rong LI Guan GOU Ping. Purification and Properties of Alliinase from Fresh Garlic (Allium sativum)[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2005, 22(05): 579 -583 .
[7] Jianxia Li, Chulan Zhang, Xiaofei Xia, Liangcheng Zhao. Cryo-sectioning Conditions and Histochemistry Comparison with Paraffin Sectioning[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2013, 48(6): 643 -650 .
[8] JIANG Yang-Ming, CUI Wei-Hong, and DONG Qian-Lin. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of tobacco planting environment based on space technology[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2012, 36(1): 47 -54 .
[9] Hu Cheng-biao, Zhu Hong-guang, Wei Yuan-lian. A Study on Microorganism and Biochemical Activity of Chinese-fir Plantation on Different Ecological Area in Guangxi[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1991, 15(4): 303 -311 .
[10] Hong-Xin SU Fan BAI Guang-Qi LI. Seasonal dynamics in leaf area index in three typical temperate montane forests of China: a comparison of multi-observation methods[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2012, 36(3): 231 -242 .