Big plants—do they limit species coexistence?

doi:10.1093/jpe/rtp012

Abstract

Abstract: Aims According to conventional theory, larger plant species are likely to inflict more intense competition on other (smaller) species. We tested a deducible prediction from this: that a larger species should generally be expected to impose greater limits on the number of species that can coexist with it.
Methods Species richness was sampled under plant canopies for a selection of woody species ('host' species) that display a wide range of adult sizes (from small shrubs to large trees), growing within natural vegetation of the Interior Douglas-fir zone of southern British Columbia, Canada. These data were compared with species richness levels sampled within randomly placed plots within the host species habitat.
Important findings A prominent host species size effect on species richness was detected but only narrowly at the small end of the species size range. Across most (90%) of the increasing size range of host species, the number of species residing under the host canopy showed no significant decrease relative to the number expected by random assembly, based on species richness within randomly defined equivalent areas within the habitat of the host species. This apparent 'null effect', we suggest, is explained not because these larger species have no effect on community assembly. We postulate that larger species are indeed likely to be more effective in causing competitive exclusion of some smaller species (as expected from conventional theory), but that any potential limitation effect of this on resident species richness is offset for two reasons: (i) larger species also generate niche spaces that they cannot exploit under their own canopies and so have minimal impact (as competitors) on smaller species that can occupy these niches and (ii) certain other small species—despite small size—have effective competitive abilities under the severe competition that occurs within host neighbourhoods of larger species. These and other recent studies call for re-evaluation of traditional views on the role of plant size in affecting competitive ability and community assembly.

Key words: competition, competitive exclusion, plant size, physical space niche, random assembly, reproductive economy

摘要：
Aims According to conventional theory, larger plant species are likely to inflict more intense competition on other (smaller) species. We tested a deducible prediction from this: that a larger species should generally be expected to impose greater limits on the number of species that can coexist with it.
Methods Species richness was sampled under plant canopies for a selection of woody species ('host' species) that display a wide range of adult sizes (from small shrubs to large trees), growing within natural vegetation of the Interior Douglas-fir zone of southern British Columbia, Canada. These data were compared with species richness levels sampled within randomly placed plots within the host species habitat.
Important findings A prominent host species size effect on species richness was detected but only narrowly at the small end of the species size range. Across most (90%) of the increasing size range of host species, the number of species residing under the host canopy showed no significant decrease relative to the number expected by random assembly, based on species richness within randomly defined equivalent areas within the habitat of the host species. This apparent 'null effect', we suggest, is explained not because these larger species have no effect on community assembly. We postulate that larger species are indeed likely to be more effective in causing competitive exclusion of some smaller species (as expected from conventional theory), but that any potential limitation effect of this on resident species richness is offset for two reasons: (i) larger species also generate niche spaces that they cannot exploit under their own canopies and so have minimal impact (as competitors) on smaller species that can occupy these niches and (ii) certain other small species—despite small size—have effective competitive abilities under the severe competition that occurs within host neighbourhoods of larger species. These and other recent studies call for re-evaluation of traditional views on the role of plant size in affecting competitive ability and community assembly.

Laura M. Keating, Lonnie W. Aarssen. Big plants—do they limit species coexistence?[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2009, 2(3): 119-124.

[1]	Christian Schöb, Nadine Engbersen, Jesús López-Angulo, Anja Schmutz, Laura Stefan. Crop Diversity Experiment: towards a mechanistic understanding of the benefits of species diversity in annual crop systems [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(6): 0-rtad016.
[2]	Shan Rao, Xin-Yu Miao, Shu-Ya Fan, Yu-Hao Zhao, Chi Xu, Shao-Peng Li. Seven-decade forest succession reveals how species colonization and extinction drive long-term community structure dynamics [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(5): 0-.
[3]	Jie Ren, Pengdong Chen, Changchao Shen, Zhibin Tao, Wei Huang. Functional and phylogenetic similarities of co-occurring invaders affect the growth of an invasive forb [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(5): 0-.
[4]	Li Zhu, Jun Xiang, Da-Yong Zhang, Wei Wang, Shuang-Guo Zhu, Bao-Zhong Wang, Li-Yuan Yang, Meng-Ying Li, You-Cai Xiong. Does a tragedy of the commons due to individual competition arise from genetically fixed traits or plastic traits in dryland wheat? An experimental verification [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(4): 0-rtad004.
[5]	Yaobing Qu, Tianzi Qin, Xinjian Shi, Jing Chen, Hui Liu, Nianxi Zhao, Yubao Gao and Anzhi Ren. The effects of Epichloë endophytes on the growth and competitiveness of Achnatherum sibiricum are mediated by soil microbe diversity [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(1): 0-.
[6]	Youli Yu, Huiyuan Cheng, Shu Wang, Mei Wei, Congyan Wang, and Daolin Du. Drought may be beneficial to the competitive advantage of Amaranthus spinosus [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(3): 494-508.
[7]	Zhiyuan Hu, Jiaqi Zhang, Yizhou Du, Kangwei Shi, Guangqian Ren, Babar Iqbal, Zhicong Dai, Jian Li, Guanlin Li and Daolin Du. Substrate availability regulates the suppressive effects of Canada goldenrod invasion on soil respiration [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(3): 509-523.
[8]	Wei-Ping Zhang, Dario Fornara, Guang-Cai Liu, Josep Peñuelas, Jordi Sardans, Jian-Hao Sun, Li-Zhen Zhang and Long Li. Interspecific interactions affect N and P uptake rather than N:P ratios of plant species: evidence from intercropping [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(2): 223-236.
[9]	Yun Guo, Yuejun He, Pan Wu, Bangli Wu, Yan Lin, Minhong He, Xu Han, Tingting Xia, Kaiping Shen, Liling Kang, Qiyu Tan, Wenda Ren, Yan Sun and Qing Li. The interspecific competition presents greater nutrient facilitation compared with intraspecific competition through AM fungi interacting with litter for two host plants in karst soil [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(2): 399-412.
[10]	Miao Liu, Helena Korpelainen and Chunyang Li. Sexual differences and sex ratios of dioecious plants under stressful environments [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(5): 920-933.
[11]	Christian Damgaard, and Jacob Weiner. The need for alternative plant species interaction models [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(5): 771-780.
[12]	Xi Luo, Loralee Larios, Carla D’Antonio, Xiaohong Xu and Hui Guo. An invading annual plant benefits less from soil biota and has reduced competitive power with a resident grass [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(5): 945-958.
[13]	Alyssa Laney Smith, Daniel Z. Atwater, Wonjae Kim, David C. Haak and Jacob N. Barney. Invasive plant rhizome production and competitiveness vary based on neighbor identity [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(4): 638-647.
[14]	Dan-Dan Li, Hong-Wei Nan, Chun-Zhang Zhao, Chun-Ying Yin and Qing Liu. Effects of warming and fertilization interacting with intraspecific competition on fine root traits of Picea asperata [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(1): 147-159.
[15]	Xi Luo, Yi Zheng, Xiaohong Xu, Rui Xiao and Hui Guo. The impacts of warming and nitrogen addition on competitive ability of native and invasive populations of Plantago virginica [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(6): 676-682.