J Plant Ecol ›› 2009, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3): 119-124.doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtp012

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Big plants—do they limit species coexistence?

Laura M. Keating and Lonnie W. Aarssen*   

  1. Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6
  • Received:2009-03-16 Accepted:2009-05-30 Online:2009-06-24 Published:2009-08-26
  • Contact: Aarssen, Lonnie E-mail:aarssenl@queensu.ca

Abstract: Aims According to conventional theory, larger plant species are likely to inflict more intense competition on other (smaller) species. We tested a deducible prediction from this: that a larger species should generally be expected to impose greater limits on the number of species that can coexist with it.
Methods Species richness was sampled under plant canopies for a selection of woody species ('host' species) that display a wide range of adult sizes (from small shrubs to large trees), growing within natural vegetation of the Interior Douglas-fir zone of southern British Columbia, Canada. These data were compared with species richness levels sampled within randomly placed plots within the host species habitat.
Important findings A prominent host species size effect on species richness was detected but only narrowly at the small end of the species size range. Across most (90%) of the increasing size range of host species, the number of species residing under the host canopy showed no significant decrease relative to the number expected by random assembly, based on species richness within randomly defined equivalent areas within the habitat of the host species. This apparent 'null effect', we suggest, is explained not because these larger species have no effect on community assembly. We postulate that larger species are indeed likely to be more effective in causing competitive exclusion of some smaller species (as expected from conventional theory), but that any potential limitation effect of this on resident species richness is offset for two reasons: (i) larger species also generate niche spaces that they cannot exploit under their own canopies and so have minimal impact (as competitors) on smaller species that can occupy these niches and (ii) certain other small species—despite small size—have effective competitive abilities under the severe competition that occurs within host neighbourhoods of larger species. These and other recent studies call for re-evaluation of traditional views on the role of plant size in affecting competitive ability and community assembly.

Key words: competition, competitive exclusion, plant size, physical space niche, random assembly, reproductive economy

[1] Wagner A. Chiba de Castro, Rafael O. Xavier, Federico H. L. Garrido, Jair H. C. Romero, Cleto K. Peres and Ruberval C. da Luz. Fraying around the edges: negative effects of the invasive Tradescantia zebrina Hort. ex Bosse (Commelinaceae) on tree regeneration in the Atlantic Forest under different competitive and environmental conditions [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(4): 713-721.
[2] Zhichun Lan, Yasong Chen, Lei Li, Feng Li, Binsong Jin and Jiakuan Chen. Testing mechanisms underlying elevational patterns of lakeshore plant community assembly in Poyang Lake, China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(3): 438-447.
[3] Robert J. Warren II, Matt Candeias, Adam Labatore, Michael Olejniczak and Lin Yang. Multiple mechanisms in woodland plant species invasion [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(2): 201-209.
[4] Lina Weiss, Linda Schalow, Florian Jeltsch and Katja Geissler. Experimental evidence for root competition effects on community evenness in one of two phytometer species [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(2): 281-291.
[5] Camilla Ruø Rasmussen, Anne Nygaard Weisbach, Kristian Thorup-Kristensen and Jacob Weiner. Size-asymmetric root competition in deep, nutrient-poor soil [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(1): 78-88.
[6] Rebekka B?gelein, Cecilia A. Pérez, Philipp Sch?fer and Frank M. Thomas. How competitive is the ‘pioneerclimax’ tree species Nothofagus alpina in pristine temperate forests#br# of Chile? [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(1): 144-156.
[7] Raquel Carolina Miatto and Marco Antonio Batalha.
Are the cerrado and the seasonal forest woody floras assembled by different processes despite their spatial proximity?
[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(5): 740-750.
[8] Joseph K. Brown, Julie C. Zinnert, Donald R. Young. Emergent interactions influence functional traits and success of dune building ecosystem engineers [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(4): 524-532.
[9] Benjamin D. Jaffe, Michael E. Ketterer, Stephen M. Shuster. Elemental allelopathy by an arsenic hyperaccumulating fern, Pteris vittata L. [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(4): 553-559.
[10] Jaime Madrigal-González, Rodrigo S. Rios, Cristina F. Aragón, Ernesto Gianoli. Indirect facilitation by a liana might explain the dominance of a small tree in a temperate forest [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(4): 604-612.
[11] Vasile Alexandru Suchar, Ronald Robberecht. Integration and scaling of UV-B radiation effects on plants: the relative sensitivity of growth forms and interspecies interactions [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(4): 656-670.
[12] Maria Paniw, Roberto Salguero-Gómez, Fernando Ojeda. Transient facilitation of resprouting shrubs in fire-prone habitats [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(3): 475-483.
[13] Ji Yoon Kim, Gu-Yeon Kim, Yuno Do, Hee-Sun Park, Gea-Jae Joo. Relative importance of hydrological variables in predicting the habitat suitability of Euryale ferox Salisb. [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(2): 169-179.
[14] Margherita Gioria, Petr Pyšek, Bruce A. Osborne. Timing is everything: does early and late germination favor invasions by herbaceous alien plants? [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(1): 4-16.
[15] Marco A. Molina-Montenegro, Alejandro del Pozo, Ernesto Gianoli. Ecophysiological basis of the Jack-and-Master strategy: Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) as an example of a successful invader [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2018, 11(1): 147-157.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Huang Fu-rui;He Tian-fu;Shen Zhao-min;Jiang Zun-he and Loo Pei-ren. Study on Effect of Sesbomia Grown in Citrus Orchard[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(02): 37 -38 .
[2] Li Song;Li Li;Zhaoqin Chu;Hongwei Xue. Brassinosteroids Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2006, 23(5): 556 -563 .
[3] WANG Xin CHONG Kang. Current Progress on the Small GTPase Gene Superfamily in Plants[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2005, 22(01): 1 -10 .
[4] Wang Yi-xiu;Xue Qing-zhong and Yan Ju-qiang. A Ultrastrnetural Observation on the resistance to Blight Leaf Disease in the Breeding of Rice Plants[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1988, 5(02): 90 -92 .
[5] Tong Ouyang;Yancheng Jiang*;Qifu Luan;Caixia Wang. Characters of Crossing of Botanical Tulipa Species from Xinjiang and Tulipa gesneriana Cultivars[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2008, 25(06): 656 -664 .
[6] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 58 .
[7] Qiang Xu, Jinzhi Lü, Yanming Miao, Runcheng Bi. Spatial Distribution Patterns and Association of Major Species in Elaeagnus mollis Communities[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2016, 51(1): 49 -57 .
[8] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2002, 19(02): 224 -230 .
[9] Yu Ji-zhou;Den Zhi-fen and Wu Bin. Effects of Rare Earth Elements on Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potassium Assimilation of Suli (P. bretschneideri Rehd)[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1993, 10(01): 48 -50 .
[10] XU Xiao-Feng HUANG Xue-Lin. TDZ: An Efficacious Plant Growth Regulator[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2003, 20(02): 227 -237 .