Journal of Plant Ecology ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 57-70.DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtab067

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  

  • 收稿日期:2020-11-01 修回日期:2020-12-08 接受日期:2021-06-01 出版日期:2022-02-01 发布日期:2022-03-18

Aboveground net primary productivity and soil respiration display different responses to precipitation changes in desert grassland

Lihua Zhang*, Junfeng Wang, Ruifeng Zhao, Yafei Guo and Lianyi Hao   

  1. College of Geography and Environment Science, Northwest Normal University, 967 Anning East Road, Lanzhou 730070, China

    *Corresponding author. E-mail: zhanglihualz@126.com
  • Received:2020-11-01 Revised:2020-12-08 Accepted:2021-06-01 Online:2022-02-01 Published:2022-03-18

摘要:

荒漠草原区地上净初级生产力和土壤呼吸对降水变化的不同响应

降水变化既影响地上植被动态,也影响地下碳循环过程,尤其以干旱半干旱生态系统对降水的响应更为敏感。然而极端降水如何影响土壤碳固存潜力仍未得出明确结果。本研究在黄土高原西部荒漠草原样地实施了为期3年的降水控制实验,该实验包含5个降水梯度(即自然降水(对照),以及在自然降水基础上的减水40%、减水20%、增水20%、增水40%)。通过对不同降水处理下植物生长指标、地上净初级生产力(ANPP)、土壤水分和土壤呼吸(Rs)进行监测,采用双侧不对称模型揭示ANPP和Rs对降水变化的响应规律;采用结构方程模型,分析降水变化下影响ANPP和Rs的直接和间接因素。研究结果表明,ANPP对极端干旱的响应比极端湿润更敏感,在干旱和湿润年份均符合负向不对称模型。ANPP的变化主要受到降水的直接影响,同时,干旱年份植物密度的变化也对ANPP产生了影响。在湿润年份,Rs对降水变化的响应也呈负向不对称性。然而,干旱年份,Rs对降水变化表现出正向不对称响应,即对降水增加响应的敏感性高于降水减少,这可能与植物生长和ANPP对增水处理的正响应增加使自氧呼吸增强,及降水事件对异氧呼吸具有较强的‘Birch效应’有关。在干旱年份Rs对极端干旱(减水40%处理)表现出饱和响应。ANPP和Rs对降水格局改变的响应模式差异表明荒漠草原区极端湿润或干旱可能降低研究区土壤碳固存的潜力。

关键词: 初级生产力, 植物生长, 土壤呼吸, 土壤碳平衡, 极端降水, 荒漠草原, 不对称响应

Abstract:

Precipitation (PPT) changes affect both aboveground vegetation dynamics and belowground carbon cycling processes, particularly in arid and semiarid regions. However, it remains unclear how extreme PPT variation can affect soil carbon sequestration potential. A 3-year PPT manipulation experiment with five levels (±40%, ±20% and ambient PPT) was conducted in a desert grassland of western Loess Plateau. Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and soil respiration (Rs) were measured to examine whether the responses of ANPP and Rs to PPT changes displayed a double asymmetry model. The ANPP was more sensitive to extreme drought than extreme wet treatments in wet and dry years, which displayed a negative asymmetric model. The change in ANPP was mainly due to the direct effect of PPT change, and plant density variation also exerted some influence in the dry year. In contrast, Rs displayed a positive asymmetry response to PPT change in dry year. This may be ascribed to enhanced autotrophic respiration due to the enhanced positive responses of plant growth and ANPP to wet treatments as well as stronger birch effect of rainfall events on heterotrophic respiration. The saturating response of Rs to extreme drought (−40% PPT treatment) was also found in the dry year. Nevertheless, the response of Rs to PPT change displayed a negative asymmetry model in wet years. The contrasting models for ANPP and Rs in response to altered PPT regime suggest that extreme wet or dry treatments may increase soil C pools effluxes toward debt in this desert grassland.

Key words: primary production, plant growth, soil respiration, soil carbon balance, extreme precipitation, desert grassland, asymmetry response