J Plant Ecol ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 139-149.doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtz055

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Changes in carbon storages of Fagus forest ecosystems along an elevational gradient on Mt. Fanjingshan in Southwest China

Qiong Cai1, Chengjun Ji1, *, Xuli Zhou1, Helge Bruelheide2,3, Wenjing Fang1, Tianli Zheng1, Jiangling Zhu1, Lei Shi4, Haibo Li3, Jianxiao Zhu1 and Jingyun Fang1   

  1. 1 Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China, 2 Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University HalleWittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108 Halle, Germany, 3 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, 4 Administration Bureau of Guizhou Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, 554400 Jiangkou, China

    *Corresponding author. E-mail: jicj@pku.edu.cn
  • Received:2019-03-24 Revised:2019-11-09 Accepted:2019-12-13 Online:2019-12-16 Published:2020-04-01

Abstract:

Aims

There are different components of carbon (C) pools in a natural forest ecosystem: biomass, soil, litter and woody debris. We asked how these pools changed with elevation in one of China’s ecologically important forest ecosystem, i.e. beech (Fagus L., Fagaceae) forests, and what were the underlying driving factors of such variation.

Methods

The four C pools in nine beech forests were investigated along an elevational gradient (1095–1930 m) on Mt. Fanjingshan in Guizhou Province, Southwest China. Variance partitioning was used to explore the relative effects of stand age, climate and other factors on C storage. In addition, we compared the four C pools to other beech forests in Guizhou Province and worldwide.

Important Findings

The total C pools of beech forest ecosystems ranged from 190.5 to 504.3 Mg C ha–1, mainly attributed to biomass C (accounting for 33.7–73.9%) and soil C (accounting for 23.9–65.5%). No more than 4% of ecosystem C pools were stored in woody debris (0.05–3.1%) and litter (0.2–0.7%). Ecosystem C storage increased significantly with elevation, where both the biomass and woody debris C pools increased with elevation, while those of litter and soil exhibited no such trend. For the Guizhou beech forests, climate and stand age were found to be key drivers of the elevational patterns of ecosystem and biomass C storage, while for beech forests globally, stand age was the most important predictor. Compared to beech forests worldwide, beech forests in Guizhou Province displayed a relatively higher biomass C accumulation rate, which may be explained by a much higher precipitation in this area. The present study provides basic data for understanding the C budgets of Chinese beech forests and their possible roles in regional C cycling and emphasizes the general importance of stand age and climate on C accumulation.

Key words: carbon components, climate, ecosystem carbon storage, elevational gradient, Fagus forests, stand age

摘要:
森林生态系统碳库通常包括植被、土壤、凋落物与木质残体等几个组分。本研究旨在探讨中国一种重要的森林生态系统—水青冈林(Fagus L.)中这些碳库的沿海拔梯度格局变化及其驱动因子。在中国贵州省梵净山,沿海拔梯度(1095–1930 m)调查了9个水青冈林各碳库的碳储量。采用方差分解探讨了林龄、气候及其他因子对碳储量的影响,同时对梵净山与贵州和全球其他地区水青冈林的碳储量进行了比较。梵净山水青冈林生态系统碳储量在190.5–504.3 Mg C ha–1之间,其主要组分包括植被碳库(33.7–73.9%)和土壤碳库(23.9–65.5%),而木质残体(0.05–3.1%)和凋落物(0.2–0.7%)对该生态系统碳储量的贡献不超过4%。随海拔升高,生态系统碳储量呈增加趋势,其中植被与木质残体碳库增加,而凋落物与土壤碳库无明显的变化趋势。对梵净山水青冈林,气候与林龄是其各组分碳储量海拔格局形成的主要原因;而对于全球水青冈林,林龄是其碳储量变化的主导因子。相比全球其他地区的水青冈林,贵州水青冈林具有较高的植被碳储量积累速率,这可能与贵州较高的降水量有关。本研究结果有助于理解中国水青冈林碳收支及其在区域碳循环中的可能作用,同时强调了林龄与气候对碳积累的重要性。

关键词: 碳组分, 气候, 生态系统碳储量, 海拔梯度, 水青冈林, 林龄

[1] Bingrui Jia, Hongru Sun, Wenying Yu and Guangsheng Zhou. Quantifying the interannual litterfall variations in China’s forest ecosystems [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(3): 266-272.
[2] Li Xiao, Jialiang Zhang, Wei Huang, Juli Carrillo, Evan Siemann and Jianqing Ding. Tallow tree allocates contrasting secondary chemicals in response to varying environments along elevational gradients [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(3): 295-303.
[3] Yun-Hua Liu, Jun-Hui Cheng, Bernhard Schmid, Li-Song Tang and Jian-Dong Sheng. Woody plant encroachment may decrease plant carbon storage in grasslands under future drier conditions [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(2): 213-223.
[4] Guo-Hong Wang, Hai-Wei Zhao, Meng An, He Li and Wei-Kang Zhang. Detecting the driving forces underlying the divergence of spruce forests in China: evidence from phytocoenology, morphology and phylogenetics [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(1): 59-69.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Yi Sun, Hui Li, Liangsheng Wang, Silan Dai. Rapid, Effective Method for Anthocyanin Analysis in Tobacco Corolla[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2011, 46(2): 189 -196 .
[2] Xie An-yong and Song Yan-ru. Prospect of Producing PHB, a Biodegradable Plastic by Using Biotechnology[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(04): 21 -25 .
[3] Fang Rong-li. The Extract, Isolation and Identification of Fenorine in Plants[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1984, 2(05): 18 -22 .
[4] Niu Jia-shu. Studies on the Determination of Element Potassium in Plant by Ahematin Current Oscillopolarngraphy[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1997, 14(02): 55 -57 .
[5] Li Lin-chu. The Twin Phenomenon of Netasequoia glyptostroboides et Cheng[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(02): 43 .
[6] Song Chun-peng;Mei Hui-sheng and Wu En. The EPR Technique of Spin Trapping for Detection of Superoxide Radicals (O2-)in Plants[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1991, 8(01): 58 -62 .
[7] Sun Min. Do the Plants of Cannabinaceae Have Latex?[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1991, 8(01): 63 -64 .
[8] Yuxia Song;Yongqing Ma;*;Dongling Niu;Shenghu Guo;Guoqi Zheng;Hongai Ma;Miao Li. Morphological Development of Parasitic Growth in Cistanche deserticola[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2008, 25(06): 680 -686 .
[9] Dan Jiang;Yinxin Li *;Lingfeng Huang;Fanrong Zeng;Yuke Zhang . Effects of Salinity and Temperature on Introduction and Cultivation of the Euhalophyte Salicornia bigelovii Torr. in the Xiamen Ambient Sea[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2008, 25(05): 533 -542 .
[10] Hao Wu;Hong Xu;Zhenlan Liu;Yaoguang Liu. Molecular basis of plant cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2007, 24(03): 399 -413 .