Journal of Plant Ecology

• •    下一篇

数字生态学揭示了中国西南山区生态安全响应阈值的空间异质性

  

  • 收稿日期:2026-01-28 接受日期:2026-05-18

Digital ecology reveals spatially heterogeneous threshold responses of ecological security in mountainous regions of Southwest China

Suling He 1,2,3,4, Jinliang Wang 1,2,3,4,*, LanFang Liu1,2,3,4, Jiya Pan1,2,3, Jun Ma1,2,3   

  1. 1 Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China;
    hesuling_97@163.com (S. H.); 2407255972@qq.com (L. L.); jypan@user.ynnu.edu.cn (J. P.); majun6982@gmail.com (J. M).
    2 Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing for Universities in Yunnan, Kunming 650500, China
    3 Center for Geospatial Information Engineering and Technology of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650500, China
    4 Southwest United Graduate School, Kunming 650092, China
    * Corresponding author: Jinliang Wang E-mail: jlwang@ynnu.edu.cn Tel & Fax: +86 13888082003
  • Received:2026-01-28 Accepted:2026-05-18

摘要: 生态安全对自然环境与人类活动的响应具有显著的非线性和空间异质性,但其非线性阈值在不同生态背景下的空间分异特征仍缺乏系统认识。以中国滇中地区为研究区,本文基于多源遥感数据,构建融合驱动力-压力-状态-生态系统服务-响应(Driver–Pressure–State–Ecosystem services–Response, DPSER) 框架与可解释机器学习方法的数据驱动分析体系,对2000—2020年区域生态安全的时空演变特征进行评估,并重点识别关键驱动因素的非线性阈值响应及其生态分区差异。结果表明, (1) 区域平均生态安全指数(Ecological security index, ESI) 由2000年的0.3533提升至2020年的0.3798,整体呈波动上升趋势。生态安全改善区域占研究区总面积的71.56%,下降区域占28.44%,且生态安全下降区域主要集中在不透水面及其邻近耕地区域。 (2) 生态安全具有明显的空间分异特征,其中分区1、 分区3和分区5的 ESI相对较高,而分区2长期处于较低水平。不同生态分区的改善幅度也存在显著差异,其中分区1增幅最大(0.0681), 分区8最小(0.0138)。 (3) 在各驱动因子中,坡度在区域尺度上始终是最稳定且最重要的影响因子,降水和高程次之。 (4) 基于SHAP的分析进一步表明,坡度对生态安全具有显著的非线性阈值效应,其全局阈值长期集中在13°–15°之间,但在不同生态分区中表现出明显的空间差异。本文通过将生态系统服务纳入生态安全评价框架,并结合可解释机器学习与生态分区尺度比较阈值,为理解生态安全形成机制及区域差异化生态治理提供了新的分析视角。

关键词: DPSER, 可解释性机器学习, 阈值效应, 空间异质性, 滇中地区

Abstract: Ecological security exhibits pronounced nonlinear responses and spatial heterogeneity to natural conditions and human activities, yet the spatial differentiation of these nonlinear thresholds across contrasting ecological contexts remains poorly understood. Focusing on Central Yunnan, China, this study developed a data-driven framework integrating the Driver–Pressure–State–Ecosystem services–Response framework with explainable machine learning and multi-source remote sensing data to assess spatiotemporal changes in ecological security from 2000 to 2020 and identify the nonlinear threshold responses of key drivers across ecological zones. The results showed that the regional mean ecological security index (ESI) increased from 0.3533 in 2000 to 0.3798 in 2020, indicating an overall fluctuating upward trend. Areas with improved ecological security accounted for 71.56% of the study area, whereas 28.44% showed decline, with degraded areas mainly concentrated in impervious surfaces their surrounding regions. Ecological security displayed marked spatial differentiation, with relatively high ESI values in Zones 1, 3 and 5, whereas Zone 2 remained persistently low. The magnitude of improvement also varies significantly among different ecological zones, with Zone 1 showing the largest increase (0.0681) and Zone 8 the smallest (0.0138). Among the examined drivers, slope consistently emerged as the most stable and influential factor at the regional scale, followed by precipitation and elevation. SHAP-based analysis further revealed a pronounced nonlinear threshold effect of slope on ecological security, with global thresholds persistently concentrated within 13°–15°, yet showing clear spatial heterogeneity among ecological zones. These findings provide new insight into ecological security formation mechanisms and support differentiated ecological governance.

Key words: DPSER, explainable machine learning, threshold effects, spatial heterogeneity, Central Yunnan Province