Journal of Plant Ecology ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 0-rtae029.DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtae029

• •    

地下芽植物芽库密度响应环境干扰的Meta分析

  

  • 收稿日期:2023-10-06 修回日期:2023-12-17 接受日期:2024-04-13 出版日期:2024-06-01 发布日期:2024-06-06

Responses of belowground bud bank density of geophytes to environmental perturbations: a meta-analysis

Tao Fang1, Duo Ye2, Ju-Juan Gao3, Fang-Li Luo1,4,*, Yao-Jun Zhu5,6,*, Fei-Hai Yu7   

  1. 1School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
    2College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321000, China;
    3Fujian MinJiang River Estuary Wetland National Nature Reserve Administrative Office, Fuzhou 350200, China;
    4The Key Laboratory of Ecological Protection in the Yellow River Basin of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100083, China;
    5Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Bejing 100083, China;
    6National Positioning Observatory for Mangrove Wetland Ecosystems, Zhanjiang 524448, China;
    7Institute of Wetland Ecology & Clone Ecology/Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China

摘要: 地下芽库是地下芽植物地下储存器官产生的无性繁殖体的集合,是地下芽植物繁殖的主要方式。地下芽库密度反映了地下芽植物群落的潜在更新能力。然而,不同的扰动和生境类型对地下芽库密度的影响尚缺乏全面的了解;此外,不同类型地下芽库对不同扰动类型的响应是否存在差异也不明确。本研究通过Meta分析系统收集了环境扰动对地下芽库密度影响的相关文献,计算了不同扰动和生境类型对各地下芽库类型密度影响的累计效应值。结果发现,由于地下芽库对扰动的响应存在相反或波动的特征,整体上环境扰动对地下芽库密度的影响较小,而干旱对芽库密度具有负效应。总体而言,环境扰动降低了根状茎芽的密度,但增加了分蘖芽的密度。环境扰动降低了湿地中的地下芽库密度,但在其它生境类型中并未发现显著影响。因此,地下芽植物的芽库对扰动有着很强的抗性和弹性,地下芽库的密度变化取决于扰动的类型、分布的生境和受扰动的芽库类型。

关键词: 无性繁殖体, 地下芽植物, 生境类型, 扰动类型, 地下发芽器官

Abstract: A belowground bud bank is a collection of asexual propagules produced by the underground storage organs of geophytes. Renewal through belowground bud banks is the main reproductive strategy of geophytes. The belowground bud bank density reflects the potential renewal capacity of geophyte communities. However, the effects of different perturbation regimes and habitats on the belowground bud bank density of geophytes are not comprehensively understood. Moreover, whether different types of belowground bud banks respond differently to perturbations is still unclear. For this meta-analysis, relevant papers on the effects of environmental perturbations on the belowground bud bank density of geophytes were systematically collected. The cumulative effect size of different perturbation regimes and habitats on belowground bud banks among different bud types was analyzed. Overall, the effect of environmental perturbations on belowground bud bank density was small, which may result from opposite or fluctuating responses of bud banks to different perturbations. Drought negatively affected bud bank density. Environmental perturbations decreased rhizome bud density but increased tiller bud density. In wetlands, perturbations decreased belowground bud bank density. However, no significant effect was found for other habitat types. In general, belowground bud banks of geophytes are highly resistant and resilient. Changes in belowground bud bank density depend on the type of perturbations, the habitats in which plants are distributed and the type of bud banks.

Key words: asexual propagule, geophytes, habitat type, perturbation regime, underground bud-bearing organ