J Plant Ecol ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 228-234 .DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rty011

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Do subtropical grasslands recover spontaneously after afforestation?

Fábio Piccin Torchelsen1,*, Monica Cadenazzi2, Gerhard Ernst Overbeck1#br#   

  1. 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500 – Bloco IV – Prédio 43433, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 91501-970, Brazil
    2 Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de La Republica—UdelaR, Paysandú, Uruguay
    *Corresponding address. Department of Botany, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91501-970, Brazil. Tel: +55-53-981199011; E-mail: fpiccin@gmail.com
  • Received:2017-06-12 Revised:2018-01-21 Accepted:2018-03-07 Online:2018-03-09 Published:2019-04-01

Abstract:

Aims

South American Pampa grasslands are habitats of great conservation interest, with a distinct and rich flora, but have been intensely converted to other land uses, including tree plantations. While necessity for restoration grows, no information on restoration potential of grasslands after afforestation exists. Here, we aim at analyzing composition and structure of grassland vegetation with a history of eucalyptus plantations in order to assess recovery potential of these areas. We hypothesized that areas with history of eucalyptus would differ from reference grasslands with no history of land-use change in terms of floristic and functional composition and would present lower species richness.

Methods

Our study region comprised four sites in the southeastern part of the Pampa biome, in the coastal plain in the extreme south of Brazil, always with sites with long (50 years) history of eucalyptus plantation and reference grassland. We sampled vegetation at post-eucalyptus sites (with and without resprouting) 10 years after clearclutting and in natural grasslands. We analyzed data by analysis of variance and ordination techniques, considering compositional parameters and life forms, and indicator species analysis.

Important Findings

Species richness and vegetation cover were higher in reference grassland than in resprout areas but did not differ from post-eucalyptus areas. Exotic species cover was significantly higher in areas with afforestation history. In terms of total composition, natural grasslands differed significantly from areas with past plantation use. Indicator species analyses revealed considerable differences between grassland types. In conclusion, vegetation development led to grassland communities that are still quite distinct from reference sites. Likely, the specificity of grassland management has a high importance in defining vegetation trajectories in time and importance for grassland recovery, and restoration needs to be addressed in more studies.

Key words: Campos Sulinos, conservation, Pampa, restoration, southern Brazil, vegetation management