J Plant Ecol ›› 2016, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2): 212-223.doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtv048

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

How do water depth and harvest intensity affect the growth and reproduction of Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) St. John?

Weiwei Xu1,2, Weiping Hu1,*, Jiancai Deng1, Jinge Zhu1 and Qinqin Li1,2   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 73 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, China; 2 University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2014-10-31 Accepted:2015-06-20 Online:2015-06-25 Published:2016-03-24
  • Contact: Hu, Weiping E-mail:wphu@niglas.ac.cn

Abstract: Aims Both high and low densities of macrophyte vegetation can impair its ecosystem service function. Harvesting is often applied to macrophyte vegetation to maintain an appropriate density. Vegetation harvesting has occasionally gone awry and caused catastrophes, such as vegetation disappearance and cyanobacterial dominance in waterways and lakes. Because water depth influences macrophyte density at all life stages, the simultaneous influences of harvesting and water depth should be carefully examined. Thus, this study aims to quantify the effects of differently harvesting Elodea nuttallii on its growth and reproduction at different water depths in field experiments.
Methods Four harvest intensities (harvesting E. nuttallii plant heights equal to 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of the water depth) were applied to E. nuttallii growing at four different water depths (60, 90, 120 and 150cm). Plant length and root length were measured. The node number, root number of each plant and number of floating plants were counted before harvesting. The harvested plant were dried to a constant weight for dry weight determination.
Important findings The rate of increase in the length and shoot number of E. nuttallii varied from ?0.012 to 0.440 day-1 and from ?0.020 to 0.639 day-1, respectively. Water depth>150cm would limit E. nuttallii growth. Elodea nuttallii responded to increasing water depths and low-intensity harvesting by increasing internodal length and decreasing shoot number. The larger internodal length of E. nuttallii observed in relatively deeper water was also induced by the physical strain generated by its buoyancy as its specific gravity was less than water's. The physical mechanism of removing the plant canopy by harvesting decreased E. nuttallii buoyancy and prevented floating. Harvesting increased plant production in shallow waters <90cm deep. Moreover, it is also necessary to perform three medium-intensity harvests at a water depth of 120cm and one low-intensity harvest or no harvesting at a water depth of 150cm to achieve longer lifetimes and less biomass near the water surface when the plants reach or approach the water surface.

Key words: Elodea nuttallii, water depth, harvest, management, response mechanism

摘要:
Aims Both high and low densities of macrophyte vegetation can impair its ecosystem service function. Harvesting is often applied to macrophyte vegetation to maintain an appropriate density. Vegetation harvesting has occasionally gone awry and caused catastrophes, such as vegetation disappearance and cyanobacterial dominance in waterways and lakes. Because water depth influences macrophyte density at all life stages, the simultaneous influences of harvesting and water depth should be carefully examined. Thus, this study aims to quantify the effects of differently harvesting Elodea nuttallii on its growth and reproduction at different water depths in field experiments.
Methods Four harvest intensities (harvesting E. nuttallii plant heights equal to 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of the water depth) were applied to E. nuttallii growing at four different water depths (60, 90, 120 and 150cm). Plant length and root length were measured. The node number, root number of each plant and number of floating plants were counted before harvesting. The harvested plant were dried to a constant weight for dry weight determination.
Important findings The rate of increase in the length and shoot number of E. nuttallii varied from ?0.012 to 0.440 day-1 and from ?0.020 to 0.639 day-1, respectively. Water depth>150cm would limit E. nuttallii growth. Elodea nuttallii responded to increasing water depths and low-intensity harvesting by increasing internodal length and decreasing shoot number. The larger internodal length of E. nuttallii observed in relatively deeper water was also induced by the physical strain generated by its buoyancy as its specific gravity was less than water's. The physical mechanism of removing the plant canopy by harvesting decreased E. nuttallii buoyancy and prevented floating. Harvesting increased plant production in shallow waters <90cm deep. Moreover, it is also necessary to perform three medium-intensity harvests at a water depth of 120cm and one low-intensity harvest or no harvesting at a water depth of 150cm to achieve longer lifetimes and less biomass near the water surface when the plants reach or approach the water surface.

[1] Yong Zeng, Chengyi Zhao, Jun Li, Yan Li, Guanghui Lv and Tong Liu. Effect of groundwater depth on riparian plant diversity along riverside-desert gradients in the Tarim River [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(3): 564-573.
[2] Fábio Piccin Torchelsen, Monica Cadenazzi, Gerhard Ernst Overbeck. Do subtropical grasslands recover spontaneously after afforestation? [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(2): 228-234.
[3] Jian Song, Zhen Liu, Yuan Zhang, Tao Yan, Zehao Shen and Shilong Piao. Effects of wildfire on soil respiration and its heterotrophic and autotrophic components in a montane coniferous forest [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(2): 336-345.
[4] Iftikhar Ali, Fiona Cawkwell, Edward Dwyer, Brian Barrett, Stuart Green. Satellite remote sensing of grasslands: from observation to management [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2016, 9(6): 649-671.
[5] Daniel Prati, Markus Peintinger, Markus Fischer. Genetic composition, genetic diversity, and small-scale environmental variation matter for the experimental reintroduction of a rare plant [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2016, 9(6): 805-813.
[6] Fang-Li Luo, Xing-Xing Jiang, Hong-Li Li, Fei-Hai Yu. Does hydrological fluctuation alter impacts of species richness on biomass in wetland plant communities? [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2016, 9(4): 434-441.
[7] Yuan Wen, Jamie L. Schuler, Shirong Liu, Pu Mou, Hui Wang, Haolong Yu, Jingxin Wang. Soil carbon dynamics in a Pinus massoniana plantation following clear-cutting and slash removal [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2016, 9(1): 20-29.
[8] Choimaa Dulamsuren, Mookhor Khishigjargal, Christoph Leuschner, Markus Hauck. Response of tree-ring width to climate warming and selective logging in larch forests of the Mongolian Altai [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2014, 7(1): 24-38.
[9] Fan Liu, Wen ying Wu, Tao Wan, Qing feng Wang, Yu Cheng, Wei Li. Temporal variation of resource allocation between sexual and asexual structures in response to nutrient and water stress in a floating-leaved plant [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2013, 6(6): 499-505.
[10] Manzoor A. Shah, Zafar A. Reshi, Claude Lavoie. Predicting plant invasiveness from native range size: clues from the Kashmir Himalaya [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2012, 5(2): 167-173.
[11] Manju V. Sharma, R. Uma Shaanker, Simon R. Leather, R. Vasudeva, Kundaranahalli R. Shivanna. Floral resources, pollinators and fruiting in a threatened tropical deciduous tree [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2011, 4(4): 259-267.
[12] Na-Na Xu, Xin Tong, Po-Kueug Eric Tsang, Hong Deng, Xiao-Yong Chen. Effects of water depth on clonal characteristics and biomass allocation of Halophila ovalis (Hydrocharitaceae) [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2011, 4(4): 283-291.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!