Contrasting responses of legume versus non-legume shrubs to soil water and nutrient shortages in the Mu Us Sandland

doi:10.1093/jpe/rtq040

Abstract

Abstract: Aims Legumes and non-legumes usually differ in using soil water and nutrients. Both water and nutrients are scarce in the semi-arid Mu Us Sandland where legume and/or non-legume shrubs coexist/dominate. Here, we addressed the responses of legume versus non-legume shrubs to different soil water and nutrient conditions.
Methods We conducted an experiment in which a legume (Hedysarum laeve) and a non-legume (Artemisia ordosica) were used, both of which are dominant species in the Mu Us Sandland. Seedlings of these two species were subjected to three water levels (45.0, 67.5 and 90.0 ml every 3 days) and three nutrient treatments (0, 0.1% and 0.2% nutrient solution every week) during the experiment.
Important findings Interactions between water and nutrients on total biomass, root weight ratio and rain use efficiency (RUE) were detected in A. ordosica but not in H. laeve, suggesting that water effects on A. ordosica but not on H. laeve are dependent on soil nutrients. Nutrient addition alleviated drought stress and increased RUE in A. ordosica. The interspecific differences in response to soil water and nutrients may be linked to the ability of plants to fix nitrogen. In addition, under low-soil water or nutrient conditions, H. laeve produced more biomass than A. ordosica, and the opposite was the case under high-soil resources. The relationship between relative growth rate (RGR) and RUE [or nutrient use efficiency (NUE)] varied with two species. RGR of A. ordosica was positively correlated with both RUE and NUE while RGR of H. laeve was negatively correlated with NUE. The different responses may be linked to the trade-off between high-growth rate and low-resource use efficiency.

Key words: biomass, legume versus non-legume, rain use efficiency, resource use strategies, root weight ratio

摘要：
Aims Legumes and non-legumes usually differ in using soil water and nutrients. Both water and nutrients are scarce in the semi-arid Mu Us Sandland where legume and/or non-legume shrubs coexist/dominate. Here, we addressed the responses of legume versus non-legume shrubs to different soil water and nutrient conditions.
Methods We conducted an experiment in which a legume (Hedysarum laeve) and a non-legume (Artemisia ordosica) were used, both of which are dominant species in the Mu Us Sandland. Seedlings of these two species were subjected to three water levels (45.0, 67.5 and 90.0 ml every 3 days) and three nutrient treatments (0, 0.1% and 0.2% nutrient solution every week) during the experiment.
Important findings Interactions between water and nutrients on total biomass, root weight ratio and rain use efficiency (RUE) were detected in A. ordosica but not in H. laeve, suggesting that water effects on A. ordosica but not on H. laeve are dependent on soil nutrients. Nutrient addition alleviated drought stress and increased RUE in A. ordosica. The interspecific differences in response to soil water and nutrients may be linked to the ability of plants to fix nitrogen. In addition, under low-soil water or nutrient conditions, H. laeve produced more biomass than A. ordosica, and the opposite was the case under high-soil resources. The relationship between relative growth rate (RGR) and RUE [or nutrient use efficiency (NUE)] varied with two species. RGR of A. ordosica was positively correlated with both RUE and NUE while RGR of H. laeve was negatively correlated with NUE. The different responses may be linked to the trade-off between high-growth rate and low-resource use efficiency.

Yuan Sui, Qingguo Cui, Ming Dong, Weiming He. Contrasting responses of legume versus non-legume shrubs to soil water and nutrient shortages in the Mu Us Sandland[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2011, 4(4): 268-274.

[1]	Wei Wang, Xiaodan Sun, Wenhao Huang, Xiaoting Men, Shijie Yi, Fengrong Zheng, Zhaohui Zhang, Zongling Wang. Soil P solubilization and plant growth promotion by a saline-alkali-tolerant P-solubilizing bacterium, Bacillus sp. DYS211 [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(6): 0-rtad028.
[2]	Le Sun, Jian Sun, Jun-Xi Wu, Zi-Yin Du, You-Jun Chen, Yi Wang, Miao Liu, Wen-Cheng Li, Er-Yuan Liang. Plant community traits and functions mediate the biomass trade-off of alpine grasslands along precipitation gradients on the Tibetan Plateau [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(5): 0-rtad009.
[3]	Zheng-Bing Yan, Di Tian, Han-Yue Huang, Yuan-Feng Sun, Xing-Hui Hou, Wen-Xuan Han, Ya-Long Guo, Jing-Yun Fang. Interactive effects of plant density and nitrogen availability on the biomass production and leaf stoichiometry of Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(3): 0-rtac101.
[4]	Shu Wang, Dao-Wei Zhou. Dynamic architectural responses of morphological traits to emergence timing in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae) [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(3): 0-rtac095.
[5]	Ravi Mohan Tiwari, Jinliang Liu, Yuchu Xie, Shenhao Yao, Shenglong Liu, Sumei Wu, Julian Liu, Haiyuan Qian, Zupei Lei, Hongwei Zhang, Lei Zhong, Boliang Wei and Mingjian Yu. Decoupling the impact of biodiversity and environmental factors on the biomass and biomass growth of trees in subtropical forests [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2023, 16(1): 0-.
[6]	Huajie Diao, Xiaopeng Chen, Ge Wang, Qiushi Ning, Shuya Hu, Wei Sun, Kuanhu Dong and Changhui Wang. The response of soil respiration to different N compounds addition in a saline–alkaline grassland of northern China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(5): 897-910.
[7]	Bowen Li, Wangwang Lv, Jianping Sun, Lirong Zhang, Lili Jiang, Yang Zhou, Peipei Liu, Huan Hong, Qi Wang, Wang A, Suren Zhang, Lu Xia, Zongsong Wang, Tsechoe Dorji, Ailing Su, Caiyun Luo, Zhenhua Zhang and Shiping Wang. Warming and grazing enhance litter decomposition and nutrient release independent of litter quality in an alpine meadow [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(5): 977-990.
[8]	Bingqian Su and Zhouping Shangguan. Stoichiometric homeostasis in response to variable water and nutrient supply in a Robinia pseudoacacia plant–soil system [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(5): 991-1006.
[9]	Ting Ma, Thomas Parker, Ned Fetcher, Steven L. Unger, Jon Gewirtzman, Michael L. Moody and Jianwu Tang. Leaf and root phenology and biomass of Eriophorum vaginatum in response to warming in the Arctic [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(5): 1091-1105.
[10]	Xiang-Qin Li, Sai-Chun Tang, Yu-Mei Pan, Chun-Qiang Wei and Shi-Hong Lü. Increased precipitation magnifies the effects of N addition on performance of invasive plants in subtropical native communities [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(3): 473-484.
[11]	Youli Yu, Huiyuan Cheng, Shu Wang, Mei Wei, Congyan Wang, and Daolin Du. Drought may be beneficial to the competitive advantage of Amaranthus spinosus [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(3): 494-508.
[12]	Zhiyong Zhou, Ying Shen, Bo Wang and Huan Zhang. Soil calcium content as the driving factor for vegetative structure and soil microbial function diverging across a fire chronosequence of the boreal forests in northeast China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(2): 372-384.
[13]	Xinyu Xiong, Jiangling Zhu, Sheng Li, Fan Fan, Qiong Cai, Suhui Ma, Haojie Su, Chengjun Ji, Zhiyao Tang, and Jingyun Fang. Aboveground biomass and its biotic and abiotic modulators of a main food bamboo of the giant panda in a subalpine spruce–fir forest in southwestern China [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2022, 15(1): 1-12.
[14]	Feng-Hui Guo, Xi-Liang Li, Jing-Jing Yin, Saheed Olaide Jimoh and Xiang-Yang Hou. Grazing-induced legacy effects enhance plant adaption to drought by larger root allocation plasticity [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(6): 1024-1029.
[15]	Rubén Portela, Rodolfo Barreiro and Sergio R. Roiloa. Effects of resource sharing directionality on physiologically integrated clones of the invasive Carpobrotus edulis [J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(5): 884-895.